A few days ago, my friend and I performed Eric Samuelsen’s
one-act play, called Gaia. Our “performance”
was really just a cold read of the play—I thought it would be more fun to read
the play out loud with someone than inwardly by myself—and our “acting” was obscured
by the first-time discovery of what we were reading. We tried to hide our
emotions as we told the story of Lucifer and Eve in the preexistence, of
Lucifer’s disgust with the unfairness of God’s plan, of Eve trying to persuade
Lucifer to come to Earth with her, and of God’s own life as a mortal before all
of this happened.
In the grand
tradition of Mormon literature, Samuelsen himself has amazingly recorded what he himself thinks the preexistence was
like! His additions to the concept include ideas about Lucifer could have been the first man on earth, or how God's own mortality was provincial and short. I’m not going to criticize how stale of an idea this whole play is; sure, it’s been
done, but people should write about what they want to write about. I don’t know
why so many authors think that their Mormonism only extends as far as The Fall of
Adam and Eve, but hey—Milton’s Paradise Lost
didn’t go any further. Maybe someday we’ll have a Milton who can tell that
story in a new, permanent way.
What instead
bothers me about Gaia is its total
ignorance of technique, form, irony, and gravity. My friend and I reveled in the
chance to ham up the play’s two emotions: scorn (Lucifer) and lachrymosity
(Eve). That one-dimensionality combined with total sincerity made lines like “Engage
with me!” and “It could have been you”
ring with bathos. (Our audience was keeled over for most of the play.) Could
Samuelsen not have come up with less operatic dialogue?
And why is this story even a play
at all? Reading it out loud made me realize how much this story doesn’t need a
theater, a stage, props, or a congregation. It could have worked just as well
(and appeared less ludicrous) as a short story, or—goodness me—an essay! But
this inattention to aesthetic is Samuelsen’s plague; it’s clear that Gaia is not interested in creating art,
but in serving as a vehicle for Samuelsen’s own ideological convictions.
In short: I'd give it a 24%, a lead medal, a 2 out of 10 iPods. Go see it only if there is no other play showing in your city.
In short: I'd give it a 24%, a lead medal, a 2 out of 10 iPods. Go see it only if there is no other play showing in your city.